The ‘HMRC Form Fraud’ and How a CHIS Obtained My Signature Through Deception

By 6 January 2018KEY ARTICLES
the-hmrc-form-fraud-and-how-a-chis-obtained-my-signature-through-deception-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin/

The 'HMRC Form Fraud' and How a CHIS Obtained My Signature Through Deception (±x)

Published on 6th January 2018
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
538

Enter more text here

Background

On 28 and 29 November 2015 Raymond Michael Callingham of Beeley Hawley & Co, along with his co-worker Kim Worrall came to see me in order to provide a full accounting and book-keeping service. By way of information I had known Callingham since around 1996 and from memory they provided audited accounts for the original Rhodium PLC in the UK, for the years 1997 and 1998.

Callingham is also the Director of Cryptodyne Ltd, and it and/or associated entities presently owe Rhodium entities and/or myself around USD 3 million.

HMRC Form 64-8 – copy e-mailed on 19 August 2015 from Callingham

However Callingham did not provide is ahead of his November 2015 trip despite me specifically asking him. It was clear that he had forgotten that I already had a copy of it so could read the terms… and it was useful to guage his behaviour 🙂

Front

Back

Audio Recordings

The following are selection of audio recordings made on the day between Edward de Saram, Praxy de Saram and I. Since I had already identified them as CHIS, for months, then providing them with audio recordings would be an acceptable method of ensuring that the event was documented properly – meaning I would have a recording and the investigators would have the same recording.

Note how EDS and PDS play dumb and continually feel they have to provide defences to third parties who have wronged me. Simply analysing the historic calls confirms the difference in content and other antics…

20151129 232500 Excerpt 06

20151129 232500 Excerpt 07

20151129 232500 Excerpt 13

20151129 232500 Excerpt 14

20151129 232500 Excerpt 15

20151129 232500 Excerpt 22

20151129 232500 Excerpt 26

20151129 232500 Excerpt 28

20151129 232500 Excerpt 39

20151129 232500 Excerpt 40

20151129 232500 Excerpt 45

20151129 232500 Excerpt 47

20151129 232500 Excerpt 48

Data Recovery

In December 2016 and subsequently I recovered the Beeley Hawley Audio and Video recordings – another one of those great mysterious of life is how they too had been deleted during Edward de Saram’s clean-up operation

Destruction of Evidence and Perversion of the Course of Justice

20171006 UPDATE - FORENSIC EVIDENCE CONFIRMING THIRD PARTIES Notwithstanding the FACT that parties had OBVIOUSLY entered my house, and had stolen...

there are some duplicates here and I am still recovering data. The updated screenshot will appear later.

These audio recordings (hundreds of them) confirm the [fraudulent] misrepresentations made by Callingham ahead of the visits, the deliverables he promised but reneged on, and most importantly confirms lack of a genuine interest to regularise our accounts.

A simple Private Prosecution to recover the monies arising from Callingham’s frauds and the losses he had caused over the preceding months would be good as I can get him and Worrall into a UK Court for cross-examination.

As the calls went on, it became more of him wanting certain items in his particular order, rather than him doing the work thoroughly and obtaining the items in any event, but merely not in his order…

I present the recovered the audio recordings of special interest, in which Callingham asked me to sign the HMRC Authorisation on 29 November 2015. I am in in the process of re-analysing these and other recordings:-

Callingham’s instruction to me were “Don’t date it because if they lose it then I will need to submit another one later on.” – excuse me? What utter bullshit! If Callingham had to submit another one later on then it would need to be another original.

Callingham had to submit the original in order for it to be valid so how would not dating it make the slightest bit of difference. Why did Callingham think HMRC would lose it?

IT’S OKAY FOR EVERYONE AROUND ME TO BE ‘PARANOID’, BUT WHEN I AM PERCEPTIVE I AM LABELLED WITH PARANOIA- HA HA. IN CALLINGHAM’S CASE IT WAS NOT PARANOIA

* * THE FORM WAS OBVIOUSLY GOING TO BE USED AS A TEMPLATE !! * *

Basically the fraud would have been me sign the blank HMRC form which could be colour-scanned and e-mailed all over the place. It would enable every Corporate Entity and Trust, the number yet to be determined to be opened up. Seems like the ‘Gift that keeps on giving’!

THE IRONY IS, IF CALLINGHAM HAD SIMPLY SCANNED ALL THE DOCUMENTS THEN WE WOULD HAVE THEM, AND IF HE HAD SIMPLY PERFORMED THE WORK THAT HE PROMISED TO DO THEN HE WOULD HAVE THE FULL ACCOUNTING POSITION AND ASSET REGISTERS.

AND INVESTIGATORS COULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH THE SAME TOO.

Not wishing me to date it would have given two options of either 28 November 2015 or 29 November 2015, if the audio evidence and discussions from the previous day were going to be used. Classic Police and/or HMRC investigation thrown in 🙂

Callingham had a bizarre interest in Taxation, Income and Payments, despite the fact that he was not qualified and/or licensed to give Taxation Advice for any of the jurisdictions in question. We had not even started the bookkeeping yet so how is taxation relevant? I had not earned for years so how was Income relevant? It was tiring though I was still polite (very unusual of me) after I cleverly identified his fraud 🙂

TO DEMONSTRATE THE FRAUD I HAD TO TAKE A PRUDENT APPROACH TO THE COMPLETION OF THE FORM, AND DEMONSTRATE MY OWN CARE IN ITS EXECUTION. THIS WAS IMPORTANT AS IT ALLOWED ME TO OBTAIN AND ANALYSE CALLINGHAM’S BEHAVIOUR IN RELATION TO IT – ESPECIALLY HOW DESPERATE HE WAS FOR ME TO SIGN IT.

So I asked for the forms back, after Callingham confirmed that they were effectively obsolete:-

And Callingham was reluctant to, saying “Let me copy it as that will give me some information.” What information – the only thing was essentially my SIGNATURE. Another bullshit excuse since it was he who typed the document and therefore he had his information already.

I knew that that the form was going to be amended continually and faxed or e-mailed to third parties!

And of course the existence of a VAT Investigation against me in the late 1990s would allow my enemies to gather information and go on a fishing trip – Margaret Cunniffe is of course the liar at the heart of all this obviously, though she never knew the full position!

So after a while I simply told him that I knew what was going on. His guilty responses and how he subsequently slinked away was funny, but to truly appreciate it you really had to have been there 🙂

HA HA!

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP